1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 53 N.J.
  5. 53 N.J. 344 (1969)
 

ROSENTHAL v. ART METAL, INC.

53 N.J. 344 (1969)

250 A.2d 747

LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST & FEIST, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ART METAL, INC., ETC., AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 17, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edwin H. Stern argued the cause for appellant, Feist & Feist (Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman & Landau, attorneys).

Mr. Joel Sondak argued the cause for appellant Lawrence H. Rosenthal (Messrs. Okin, Okin & Sondak, attorneys; Messrs. Schechner & Targan, of counsel).

Mr. William L. Dill, Jr., argued the cause for respondent General Dynamics Corp. (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys; Mr. W. Hunt Dumont, of counsel).

Mr. Richard R. Hellstern argued the cause for respondent Art Metal. Inc. (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin & Kohl, attorneys; Mr. Murry D. Brochin and Mr. Richard R. Hellstern, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 101 N.J.Super. 156.

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases