FORSTEIN v. PILOT LIFE INS. CO.

44200, 44201.

119 Ga. App. 273 (1969)

166 S.E.2d 922

FORSTEIN v. PILOT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; and vice versa.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided February 14, 1969.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kaler, Karesh & Rubin, Sanford R. Karesh, J. Ben Shapiro, Jr., for appellant.

Bryan, Carter, Ansley & Smith, Henry M. Quillian, Jr., for appellee.


FELTON, Chief Judge.

1. The evidence shows without dispute that the insurance company alone was responsible for the wording of the policy. In such a case it must be construed in favor of the insured if the provisions of the policy in question are ambiguous. At this late date citations of authority for this proposition are superfluous.

The first consideration goes to the question whether the policy definition of the word "home" is ambiguous. All relevant things...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases