1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 41 Wis.2d
  5. 41 Wis.2d 349 (1969)
 

ESTATE OF BREHMER

No. 89.

41 Wis.2d 349 (1969)

164 N.W.2d 318

ESTATE OF FRANK BREHMER: EUGENE BREHMER, Appellant, v. DEMIEN, Executrix, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 4, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by William A. Ketterer of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Frank & Hiller of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Herbert M. Hiller.

CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.

It is well established that in order to void a will because of undue influence, the objector must prove four elements:

Susceptibility—a person who is susceptible of being unduly influenced by the person charged with exercising undue influence.

Opportunity—the opportunity of the person charged to exercise such influence on the susceptible person to procure the improper favor.

Disposition

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases