1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 305 F.Supp.
  5. 305 F.Supp. 75 (1969)
 

UNITED STATES v. STONE

Crim. No. 1233-68.

305 F.Supp. 75 (1969)

UNITED STATES of America v. Andrew L. STONE, Francis N. Rosenbaum, Evelyn R. Price, Robert B. Bregman, Chromcraft Corp., ALSCO, Inc.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

September 15, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Martin, Jr., and Michael T. Epstein, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Seymour Glanzer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for the United States.

Edward Bennett Williams, Vincent Fuller, and Robert Weinberg, Washington, D. C., for defendants Stone and Rosenbaum.

Norman London, St. Louis, Mo., of the Bar of the State of Missouri, admitted pro hac vice for defendant Price.

James C. Toomey, Washington, D. C., for defendant Bregman.

Chester M. Fulton, Washington, D. C., for defendants Chromcraft and ALSCO.

MEMORANDUM

GASCH, District Judge.

The question before the Court is whether the Government must disclose records of intercepted telephone conversations in which one of the defendants in this case participated.1 The exclusionary rule originating in Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 34 S.Ct. 341, 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914), and applied to the states in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases