1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 226 So.2d
  5. 226 So.2d 149 (1969)
 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO. v. McINNISH

6 Div. 605.

226 So.2d 149 (1969)

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. Linda McINNISH, pro aml.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Izas Bahakel, Birmingham, for petitioner.

Clarence M. Small, Jr., and Rives, Peterson, Pettus & Conway, Birmingham, opposed.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Citation is scarcely necessary to support the rule which has been stated as follows:

"If an insurance contract is so drawn as to be equivocal, uncertain or ambiguous, or to require interpretation because fairly susceptible to two or more different interpretations, the one will be adopted, which, if consistent with the objects of insurance, is most favorable to the insured. . . . ." Trans-Continental Mutual Insurance Co. v. Harrison, 262...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases