1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 106 N.J.
  5. 106 N.J. Super. 266 (1969)
 

MIRAGLIA v. MIRAGLIA

106 N.J. Super. 266 (1969)

255 A.2d 762

GINO MIRAGLIA AND FAUSTO MIRAGLIA, BY THEIR GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ALBERT MIRAGLIA, AND ALBERT MIRAGLIA, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS, v. FRANK MIRAGLIA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ERNA J. GROTZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 23, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Franklin M. Sachs argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McCarter & English, attorneys; Mr. Eugene M. Haring, of counsel).

Mr. Robert J. Alberque argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Alberque and McGovern, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CARTON, J.A.D.

This case involves the interplay of the collateral estoppel doctrine and the rules governing contribution between joint tortfeasors.

Two automobiles, operated respectively by Erna Grotz and Frank Miraglia, and travelling in opposite directions on Route 17, collided when the Grotz car was about to make a left turn across that road into a restaurant parking lot. Mrs. Grotz was alone. Gino and Fausto Miraglia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases