SCHNUTH v. HARRISON

No. 116.

44 Wis.2d 326 (1969)

171 N.W.2d 370

SCHNUTH, Respondent, v. HARRISON, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 28, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by James C. McKenzie of La Crosse.

For the respondent there was a brief by Robert D. Johns, Jr., and Johns, Flaherty, Harman & Gillette, all of La Crosse, and oral argument by Robert D. Johns, Jr.


WILKIE, J.

This is an action seeking rescission of the agreement between the parties by reason of false representations knowingly made by defendant to induce plaintiff to enter into the agreement. On this appeal the issues can be simply stated:

1. Are the findings of the trial court as to the false representations contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence?

2. In an action for rescission can plaintiff recover all the items...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases