1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 227 So.2d
  5. 227 So.2d 138 (1969)
 

ESSEX v. STATE

2 Div. 7.

227 So.2d 138 (1969)

William ESSEX, Jr. v. STATE.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied October 7, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. M. Lowrey, Jr., Linden, for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., for the State.

On Rehearing

CATES, Judge.

On rehearing Essex asks the meaning our cryptic "Affirmed (No Op.)," pronounced August 19, 1969 on his coram nobis appeal. "Affirm," according to Black's Law Dictionary, means:

"In the practice of appellate courts, to affirm a judgment, decree, or order, is to declare that it is valid and right, and must stand as rendered below; to ratify and reassert it; to concur in its correctness and confirm its efficacy. Boner v....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases