1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 106 N.J.
  5. 106 N.J. Super. 259 (1969)
 

OPTICIANS OF N.J., INC. v. STATE BD. OF EXAM.

106 N.J. Super. 259 (1969)

255 A.2d 282

THE GUILD OF PRESCRIPTION OPTICIANS OF NEW JERSEY, INC., A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE SOCIETY OF DISPENSING OPTICIANS OF NEW JERSEY, INC., A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND ROBERT C. TROAST, PETITIONERS, v. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF OPHTHALMIC DISPENSERS AND OPHTHALMIC TECHNICIANS, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 26, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert P. McDonough argued the cause for petitioners (Messrs. McDonough, Murray & Meeker, attorneys).

Mr. Douglas J. Harper, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Stephen Skillman, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEWIS.

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before us on a petition for declaratory judgment under R.R. 4:88-10. The petition challenges the validity of administrative Rule 37 adopted by respondent, State Board of Examiners of Ophthalmic Dispensers and Ophthalmic Technicians, a State administrative agency created under the act regulating the practice of ophthalmic dispensing and ophthalmic technicianry. N.J.S.A. 52:17B-41.1 et seq.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases