1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 41 Wis.2d
  5. 41 Wis.2d 312 (1969)
 

STATE v. GROPPI

No. State 38.

41 Wis.2d 312 (1969)

164 N.W.2d 266

STATE, Respondent, v. GROPPI, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 4, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Thomas M. Jacobson and Allen L. Samson, both of Milwaukee, and Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, and Haywood Burns, all of New York, N. Y., and oral argument by Mr. Jacobson.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Harold B. Jackson, Jr., assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and David J. Cannon, district attorney.

HANLEY, J.

The defendant presents the following issues on this appeal:

1. Is sec. 956.03 (3), Stats., unconstitutional either on its face or as applied in this case?

2. May a trial court quash a subpoena which has been properly issued and served upon a witness the defendant desired to call in his defense?

Unconstitutionality of Sec. 956.03 (3), Stats.

Appellant claims the change of venue statute is unconstitutional on several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases