1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 1 Wn.
  5. 1 Wn. App. 342 (1969)
 

STATE v. PRATER

No. 77-40669-1.

1 Wn. App. 342 (1969)

461 P.2d 357

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. HARRY LEE PRATER, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One, Panel 2.

November 24, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Casey & Pruzan and Richard A. Acarregui, for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

Charles O. Carroll, Prosecuting Attorney, and Steve Paul Moen, Deputy, for respondent.

HOROWITZ, A.C.J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of robbery. The trial court denied defendant's motion for new trial. Defendant appeals.

[1, 2] The controlling question here is whether the defendant was convicted in violation of due process. In turn, the answer to that question is whether "eyewitness identification" of the defendant "at trial following a pretrial identification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases