1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 269 Cal.App.2d
  5. 269 Cal.App.2d 64 (1969)
 

HAMILTON v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Docket No. 32313.

269 Cal.App.2d 64 (1969)

75 Cal. Rptr. 106

P.M. HAMILTON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent; ALLIED PROPERTIES, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

January 23, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Price, Postel & Parma, Robert M. Jones and James H. Hurley, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Robert K. Cutler and George P. Kading, County Counsel and Dana D. Smith, Assistant County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Goux & Romasanta, J.F. Goux, Kenneth R. Nuss and Thomas P. Anderle, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

KINGSLEY, J.

The real party in interest owns a tract of real property, located on Channel Drive in Montecito, Santa Barbara County, on which it has for many years operated a cottage-type hotel (The Santa Barbara Biltmore) as a "non-conforming" pre-zoning use and under a conditional use permit heretofore granted to it pursuant to section 9 of Santa Barbara Ordinance No. 453. In 1966, it applied to the Santa Barbara Planning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases