STATE v. CARY


53 N.J. 256 (1969)

250 A.2d 15

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PAUL GORDON CARY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 6, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur J. Timins, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Leo Kaplowitz, Union County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Arthur J. Timins on the brief).

Mr. Oscar F. Laurie argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Lieb and Teich, attorneys; Mr. Howard Schwartz on the brief).


The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

This case is before us for the second time. In State v. Cary, 49 N.J. 343 (1967), we approved an order of the trial court compelling the defendant, who had been indicted for murder, to submit to a voice recording for the purpose of "voiceprint identification," provided that on remand the voiceprint technique and equipment first be shown to be sufficiently accurate to produce...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases