1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 54 N.J.
  5. 54 N.J. 239 (1969)
 

M. DEAN KAUFMAN, INC. v. AMERICAN MACH. & FOUNDRY CO.

54 N.J. 239 (1969)

254 A.2d 786

M. DEAN KAUFMAN, INC., ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. AMERICAN MACHINE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND TUBOSCOPE COMPANY, ETC., DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 1, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Albert G. Besser argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hannoch, Weisman, Stern & Besser, attorneys; Mr. James J. Shrager on the brief).

Mr. William L. Dill, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys; Mr. William S. Tucker, Jr. on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

We affirm essentially for the reasons given by the Appellate Division. 102 N.J.Super. 1 (App. Div. 1968). However, without proof that it is generally recognized in the finder's business or profession that "in contracts of this type, absent specific contractual language to the contrary, there is an implied prerequisite of `authority to offer' which must exist between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases