DEEN, Judge.
The sole question in this condemnation case, it having been stipulated that consequential damages to the land not taken were exceeded by consequential benefits, is whether the just and adequate compensation awarded the owner by the condemning authority taking land for a nonaccess or limited access highway includes compensation for the taking of the owner's easement of access to the highway being constructed. Appellants rely on State Hwy. Dept. v. Lumpkin...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
