KINGSLEY v. MAKAY

[No. 168, September Term, 1968.]

253 Md. 24 (1969)

251 A.2d 585

KINGSLEY, ET AL v. MAKAY, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 1, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred W. Spates, with whom was Daniel B. Wiegers on the brief, for appellants.

Joseph Forer for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SMITH, JJ.


McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The alienability of an equitable interest in realty is the topic of this causerie. Appellants argue that if an equitable interest is created by a recorded instrument, even though recording is not required, it can be transferred only by another recorded instrument. The trial judge (Shook, J.), with whom we agree, held to the contrary. There seems to be no significant controversy about the facts.

In March 1963...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases