1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 104 N.J.
  5. 104 N.J. Super. 169 (1969)
 

SOUTH SHORE NATIONAL BANK v. DONNER, ET AL.

104 N.J. Super. 169 (1969)

249 A.2d 25

SOUTH SHORE NATIONAL BANK, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. MARK M. DONNER, BETTE S. DONNER, RUTH SATSKY JEWELRY AND JULES BRUSKIN, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided January 7, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Furst, attorney for defendants Ruth Satsky Jewelry and Jules Bruskin.

Mr. Samuel A. Gennet, attorney for plaintiff (Mr. William D. Bierman, appearing).

MILMED, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

Defendants Ruth Satsky Jewelry, a corporation, and Jules Bruskin move for a summary judgment in their favor against plaintiff South Shore National Bank, contending that plaintiff has no legal right to maintain its suit against them.

The action was instituted by plaintiff bank against the defendants Mark M. Donner, Bette S. Donner, Ruth Satsky Jewelry and Jules Bruskin for, among other things, the recovery of $7,000 paid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases