1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 1 Cal.App.3d
  5. 1 Cal.App.3d 263 (1969)
 

STIEFEL v. McKEE

Docket No. 33834.

1 Cal.App.3d 263 (1969)

81 Cal. Rptr. 565

SIEGFRIED STIEFEL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BRUCE McKEE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

October 29, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Toftness & Dalton and George E. Dalton for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Cadoo, Tretheway, McGinn & Morgan and Alvin S. Tobias for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

ROTH, P.J.

Respondent Bruce McKee was a licensed salesman for respondent Hugo Becker, a licensed real estate broker doing business as Kent Realty (brokers). Brokers were employed by appellants Stiefel, husband and wife (Stiefels) to assist them in arranging a transaction whereby the Stiefels would dispose of two apartment units owned by them for cash to Mayan Developers (Mayan) said cash to be used in concurrently acquiring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases