LANSFORD v. GATLIFF

44190.

119 Ga. App. 145 (1969)

166 S.E.2d 639

LANSFORD et al. v. GATLIFF.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided February 4, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Culpepper & Culpepper, Sampson M. Culpepper, for appellants.

Wells & Adams, Charles R. Adams, Jr., for appellee.


DEEN, Judge.

1. The contention of the appellee that it is necessary for appellant, if he desires the sufficiency of evidence to be considered, to move for either a directed verdict, a new trial, or judgment notwithstanding the verdict is without merit. "The entry of judgment on a verdict by the trial court constitutes an adjudication by the trial court as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, affording a basis for review on appeal without further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases