CRADDOCK v. T. A. LOVING AND COMPANY

No. 691SC336.

169 S.E.2d 74 (1969)

5 N.C. App. 606

H. R. CRADDOCK v. T. A. LOVING AND COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 13, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilkinson & Vosburgh, by John A. Wilkinson, Washington, for plaintiff appellee.

Rodman & Rodman, by Thomas E. Archie, Washington, for defendant appellant.


MORRIS, Judge.

The defendant on appeal relies primarily on two assignments of error: Failure of the court to sustain its motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence and prejudicial error in the charge.

In considering whether defendant's motion for nonsuit at the close of all the evidence should be granted, all of the evidence which tends to support plaintiff's claim must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases