HEDAYA v. HEDAYA


68 Misc.2d 165 (1969)

Caroll Hedaya, Plaintiff, v. Joseph Hedaya, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

December 10, 1969


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erdheim & Shalleck (Irving I. Erdheim of counsel), for plaintiff. Benjamin Wyle and Mendel Zucker for defendant.


CARMINE A. VENTIERA, J.

Upon the trial of this action for divorce, the plaintiff, having discontinued a second cause, proceeded on the ground of living apart for two years pursuant to a judgment of separation in her favor (Domestic Relations Law, § 170, subd. [5]). Satisfactory proof having been presented, judgment of divorce is granted to the plaintiff.

The complaint sets forth a third cause of action demanding the sum of $173.26 upon an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases