GUARDIANSHIP OF CLAUS

No. 6.

45 Wis.2d 179 (1969)

172 N.W.2d 643

GUARDIANSHIP OF CLAUS: CLAUS, Appellant, v. LINDEMANN, Guardian, and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 19, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by L. William Connolly of Milwaukee.

For the respondent guardian there was a brief by R. J. Schimmel and George R. Schimmel, attorneys, and Arnold, Murray & O'Neill of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by George R. Schimmel.


ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

Several specific issues are raised on this appeal. All are to be considered against the general background or frame of reference that we deal here with the endeavor of a person placed under guardianship to terminate such guardianship. This court has held that since the appointment of a guardian over a person or a person's estate is a serious and significant court action,1 the exacting jurisdictional requirements of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases