BOLLER v. COFRANCES

No. 33.

42 Wis.2d 170 (1969)

166 N.W.2d 129

BOLLER, Administratrix of the Estate of HENRY BOLLER, Appellant, v. COFRANCES and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided April 1, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Arneson, Berg & Doyle and Patrick R. Doyle, all of La Crosse, and oral argument by Patrick R. Doyle.

For the respondents there was a brief by Crosby & Esch and Fredric W. Crosby, all of La Crosse, and oral argument by Fredric W. Crosby.


HEFFERNAN, J.

On this appeal the plaintiff claims that the trial court should have instructed the jury that:

"The disfavored driver in determining whether the favored driver is approaching the intersection should not be bound to anticipate that the favored driver would be approaching at an unreasonably high rate of speed in excess of the speed limit."

Whether the trial judge should have given the instruction now urged will not be decided on this appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases