CULLUM v. SEIFER

Docket No. 33221.

1 Cal.App.3d 20 (1969)

81 Cal. Rptr. 381

CLEO W. CULLUM, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HAROLD W. SEIFER, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

October 20, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kirtland & Packard, Wallace C. Reed, and Ellis J. Horvitz for Defendant and Appellant.

Howard W. Shelton for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

STEPHENS, J.

This action is one for alleged malpractice. The jury verdict was for the defendant. The court granted a motion for new trial. The defendant appealed.

The facts are that plaintiff, Cleo W. Cullum, first consulted defendant, Dr. Harold W. Seifer, on June 10, 1965. Plaintiff had had a considerable number of medical problems for several years, and had received...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases