1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 54 N.J.
  5. 54 N.J. 151 (1969)
 

CARDELL, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF MADISON

54 N.J. 151 (1969)

253 A.2d 814

CARDELL, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND J. RICHARD HUDANICH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MANZO CONTRACTING CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 6, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Stewart M. Hutt argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Hutt and Berkow, attorneys).

Mr. Marc J. Gordan and Mr. Mark L. Stanton argued the cause for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Labrecque in the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For affirmance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases