1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 19 Ohio
  5. 19 Ohio Misc. 184 (1969)
 

CITY OF CLEVELAND v. HURWITZ

Nos. 729402, 729404, 729830 and 729831.

19 Ohio Misc. 184 (1969)

CITY OF CLEVELAND v. HURWITZ ET AL.,

Probate Court of Cuyahoga County.

Decided July 25, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jonathan S. Dworkin, Mr. Donald J. Guillar, Mr. William D. Moore and Mr. Timothy D. Cotner, for plaintiff.

Mr. David Ralph Hertz, for defendant Hurwitz. Mr. Otto Miller, III, for defendants Southwestern Savings & Loan Co. et al.

Mr. Matthew A. Zidar and Mr. Henry DuLaurence, Jr., for defendants Hough-East Eighty-Fifth Street Co. et al.

Mr. Milton Schulman, for defendant Gumprecht.

BARTUNEK, J.

This matter comes before the court upon a consolidation of four appropriation cases for the single purpose of determining the date of take, or in other words, the date of valuation of certain properties being taken by the city of Cleveland for urban renewal purposes.

Under ordinary circumstances, the date of take of a property being appropriated in Ohio is the date the jury is impanelled in the trial to determine the amount of just compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases