1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 44 Wis.2d
  5. 44 Wis.2d 138 (1969)
 

SARTIN v. STATE

Nos. State 73-75.

44 Wis.2d 138 (1969)

170 N.W.2d 727

SARTIN (JAMES), Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error. SARTIN (JOHN L.), Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error. PIERCE, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided September 30, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiffs in error there was a brief by Oldenburg & Lent and Charles P. Dykman, all of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Dykman.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general.

WILKIE, J.

Two issues are raised by this review. They are:

1. Was there sufficient evidence introduced to prove intent on the part of the defendants to permanently deprive the owner of the car of his property?

2. Was the jury correct in determining that the value of the car on the date of the taking was $125, making the crime a felony under sec. 943.20 (3) (b), Stats.?

Before considering these issues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases