FISCHER v. STEELOCK OF MINNESOTA, INC.

No. 41272-3.

168 N.W.2d 10 (1969)

Lawrence FISCHER and Arnold M. Rustad, Respondents, v. STEELOCK OF MINNESOTA, INC., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 9, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thuet, Todd, Anderson & Collins, South St. Paul, for appellant.

Korstad, Pokorny, Brophey & Lucas, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and NELSON, MURPHY, OTIS, and FRANK T. GALLAGHER, JJ.


OPINION

FRANK T. GALLAGHER, Justice.

These are appeals by defendant from an order of the district court denying its motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial following jury verdicts for plaintiffs.

There is a good deal of disagreement between the parties over the facts of the cases. It appears undisputed that in 1964 plaintiffs, Lawrence Fischer and Arnold M. Rustad, were employed by Steelock Building Company, which sold and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases