1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 303 F.Supp.
  5. 303 F.Supp. 1400 (1969)
 

UNITED STATES v. PABST BREWING COMPANY

No. 59-C-215.

303 F.Supp. 1400 (1969)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PABST BREWING COMPANY, Schenley Industries, Inc., the Val Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. Wisconsin.

August 6, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bertram Long and Francis C. Hoyt, Dept. of Justice, Anti-Trust Division, Chicago, Ill., David Cannon, U. S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

Glenn McGee, Snyder, Chadwell, Keck, Kayser & Ruggles, Chicago, Ill., Ray T. McCann, Milwaukee, Wis., for Pabst Brewing Co.

Ralph Hoyt, Milwaukee, Wis., Leonard J. Emmerglick, Washington, D. C., for Schenley and Val Corp.

OPINION

TEHAN, Chief Judge.

On February 27, 1969, findings of fact and conclusions of law were entered in this case holding that the acquisition of Blatz by Pabst in 1958 was a violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act. D.C., 296 F.Supp. 994. The problem of providing a remedy for that violation remained. Very relevant to that problem was the fact that after the acquisition, but before the commencement of this suit in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases