RISTUCCIA v. ADAMS

No. 22022.

406 F.2d 1257 (1969)

Frank and Lucille RISTUCCIA, Appellants, v. Earl and Bernice ADAMS, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Ristuccia (argued), for appellants.

Charles A. Price (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES, ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Appellants were state court defendants who successfully counterclaimed in that litigation which was concluded on September 11, 1963, when the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles entered judgment for them. Approximately one year later appellants, acting in propria persona, moved to reopen the judgment and modify the award, alleging fraud and collusion by their attorneys and the opposing parties. This motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases