LITMON v. ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION

No. 69-13.

20 Ohio St. 2d 131 (1969)

LITMON, APPELLANT, v. ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 23, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Kondritzer, Gold & Frank and Mr. Marcus R. Kondritzer, for appellant.

Messrs. Cohen, Todd, Kite & Spiegel, for appellees Helen Martin and M. Chester Martin.

Mr. Paul W. Brown, attorney general, Mr. Walter J. Howdyshell, Mr. William J. Petro and Mr. James Maurer, for appellee Administrator of the Bureau of Workmen's Compensation.


O'NEILL, J.

The facts are not in dispute.

The question presented by this cause is: Are household servants, employed solely to render services in connection with the functioning, operation and maintenance of a private dwelling, "employees" within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation law of this state?

The appellant relies upon Section 4123.01(B)(2), Revised Code, which defines "employer" in the following language:

"Every person, firm, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases