1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 299 F.Supp.
  5. 299 F.Supp. 1129 (1969)
 

J. E. BERNARD & CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3822; Protest No. 67/18105-3566.

299 F.Supp. 1129 (1969)

J. E. BERNARD & CO., Inc. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, First Division.

May 14, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schwartz & Lidstrom, Chicago, Ill. (Joseph Schwartz and Earl R. Lidstrom, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian S. Goldstein, New York City, trial attorney), for defendant.

Before WATSON, MALETZ, and RE, Judges.

MALETZ, Judge:

This case involves the proper tariff classification of certain "meter irises" which are components of built-in exposure correcting systems of Bell & Howell eight-millimeter motion-picture cameras. The meter irises were imported from West Germany and entered at Chicago in September and November 1966 by plaintiff as customs broker for the Bell & Howell company. They were classified by the district director of customs in Chicago under item 722...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases