1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 408 F.2d
  5. 408 F.2d 1006 (1969)
 

N.L.R.B. v. HARRAH'S CLUB

No. 21689.

408 F.2d 1006 (1969)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. HARRAH'S CLUB, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 13, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solomon I. Hirsh (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert M. Lieber, Atty., Washington, D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Nathan R. Berke (argued) of Severson, Werson, Berke & Bull, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before: MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The Board has submitted a judgment for our approval, pursuant to our decision in this case (NLRB v. Harrah's Club, 9 Cir., 1968, 403 F.2d 865). Respondent objects on two grounds, first, that the judgment is premature, and second, that portions of the proffered judgment are overly broad. See Rule 19, Fed.R.App.Proc.

The argument that the judgment is premature rests upon the fact that we did not specifically direct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases