1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 307 F.Supp.
  5. 307 F.Supp. 1097 (1969)
 

UNITED STATES v. GRINNELL CORPORATION

No. 65 Civ. 2486.

307 F.Supp. 1097 (1969)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. GRINNELL CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 24, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Noel E. Story and Richard M. Clinton, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Cahill, Gordon, Sonnett, Reindel & Ohl, New York City, for defendant Grinnell Corp.

White & Case, New York City, for defendant American District Telegraph Co.

Kelley, Drye, Newhall, Maginnes & Warren, New York City, for defendant Holmes Electric Protective Co.

Stickles, Hayden, Kennedy, Hort & Van Steenburgh, New York City, for defendant Automatic Fire Alarm Co. of Delaware.

METZNER, District Judge.

The federal government, plaintiff in this antitrust damage action, moves for a determination that the defendants are collaterally estopped from litigating the issue of defendants' violation of the antitrust laws. All the defendants herein have previously been found to have violated §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 & 2, in an enforcement action brought by the government. United States v. Grinnell Corp.,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases