1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 415 F.2d
  5. 415 F.2d 979 (1969)
 

PUHARICH v. BRENNER

No. 22286.

415 F.2d 979 (1969)

Henry K. PUHARICH, Appellant, v. Edward J. BRENNER, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 25, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Fritz Schweitzer, Jr., New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for appellant. Mr. Donald R. Dunner, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D. C., Attorney, with whom Mr. Joseph Schimmel, Solicitor, was on the brief, for appellee.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and McGOWAN and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant, a disappointed applicant for a patent, brought an action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking a judgment awarding him a patent. The district court gave judgment to the Commissioner. We affirm.

I

Appellant claims to have invented a device that is effective to expand extra sensory perception and assist in the study of the so-called extra sensory phenomenon. It is a kind of cage, one that apparently looks something...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases