1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 459 P.2d
  5. 459 P.2d 879 (1969)
 

CITY OF PORTLAND v. SWANSON

459 P.2d 879 (1969)

CITY OF PORTLAND, a Municipal Corporation, Acting by and through the Portland Development Commission As the Duly Designated Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Portland, Respondent, v. Albert SWANSON, Reuben Lenske and Rose Lenske, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided October 22, 1969.

Rehearing Denied December 30, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reuben Lenske, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants.

Donald R. Stark, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Williams, Montague, Stark & Thorpe and Oliver I. Norville, Portland.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to condemn certain property owned by defendants. Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiff.

This action was brought by the City of Portland acting through the Portland Development Commission, which is the urban renewal agency of the City of Portland.

Defendants' answer admits that Portland Development Commission is the duly designated urban renewal agency of the City of Portland created pursuant to ORS Ch 457 and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases