1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 418 F.2d
  5. 418 F.2d 906 (1969)
 

DiPAOLA v. INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL OPERATING CO.

Nos. 166, 167, Dockets 33322, 33384.

418 F.2d 906 (1969)

Gaetano DiPAOLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL OPERATING CO., Inc., Dominican Steamship Line, Brodin Line and Daido Line, Defendants-Appellees, and INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL OPERATING CO., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and Rederiaktiebolaget Disa, Rederiaktiebolaget, Poseidon, Aktiebolaget Svenska Orient Linien and Japan Line, Ltd., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees, v. PIER 8 TERMINALS, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided November 25, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chester A. Hahn, New York City (Sylvia Miller, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Tidal B. Henry, New York City (Fogarty and Nielsen, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee, International Terminal Operating Co., Inc.

David P. H. Watson, New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees Rederiaktiebolaget Disa, Rederiaktiebolaget Poseidon and Aktiebolaget Svenska Orient Linien, sued herein as Brodin Line, and third-party plaintiffs-appellants Rederiaktiebolaget Disa, Rederiaktiebolaget Poseidon and Aktiebolaget Svenska Orient Linien.

Daniel J. Dougherty, New York City (Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, on the brief), for Japan Line, Ltd. (formerly Daido Line), defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellee-appellant.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

DiPaola, an employee of third-party defendant Pier 8 Terminals, Inc. ("Pier 8"), brought this suit in admiralty for damages to compensate him for injuries suffered on September 20, 1963, when some stacked bags of coffee fell upon him while he was sweeping the floor of a warehouse on the pier where the bags were stored after being unloaded from the motor vessel Lia on either September 17 or 18, 1963. Judge Mansfield granted a motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases