1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 449 P.2d
  5. 449 P.2d 850 (1969)
 

STATE v. PULLEN

449 P.2d 850 (1969)

The STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Edward Roland PULLEN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided January 29, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and submitted the brief for appellant.

Doyle L. Schiffman, Dist. Atty., Roseburg, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, O'CONNELL, and LANGTRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant's only claim of error in this appeal from a conviction of rape is that the trial court should not have received into evidence statements made by defendant. He claims he was not advised of his rights in the manner required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966).

Defendant was in custody on another charge when the questioning that resulted in the statements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases