1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 44 Wis.2d
  5. 44 Wis.2d 85 (1969)
 

STATE v. ESCOBEDO

No. State 4.

44 Wis.2d 85 (1969)

170 N.W.2d 709

STATE, Respondent, v. ESCOBEDO, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided September 30, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Robert T. McGraw, and oral argument by Patrick F. Brown, both of Waukesha.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Roger P. Murphy, district attorney of Waukesha county.

HEFFERNAN, J.

We decline to review the defendant's claim that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. A perusal of the record reveals no motion in the trial court for either a new trial or a motion to set aside the verdict on the alleged insufficiency of the evidence.

We stated in State v. Van Beek (1966), 31 Wis.2d 51, 141 N.W.2d 873, that we would decline to review a conviction on this basis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases