1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 410 F.2d
  5. 410 F.2d 871 (1969)
 

PURER & COMPANY v. AKTIEBOLAGET ADDO

No. 22037.

410 F.2d 871 (1969)

PURER & COMPANY and Phillip Purer, Appellants, v. AKTIEBOLAGET ADDO and Addo Machine Company, Inc., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing May 29, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph W. Fairfield (argued), Ethelyn F. Black, Alfred W. Omansky, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellants.

G. William Shea (argued), of McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before HAMLEY and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and PLUMMER, District Judge.

PLUMMER, District Judge:

This action was commenced in the United States District Court for the Central District of California by appellees to obtain a preliminary injunction, a permanent injunction, damages for patent infringement, trademark, infringement and unfair competition, and for costs and attorneys' fees.

The case was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment was entered enjoining appellants from engaging in unfair competition and infringing appellees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases