1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 457 P.2d
  5. 457 P.2d 782 (1969)
 

O'ROURKE v. CITY OF TULSA

No. 42920.

457 P.2d 782 (1969)

Dan F. O'ROURKE, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant in Error and Cross-Petitioner in Error, Ira J. Dietrich and Other Persons Similarly Situated, Intervenors-Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 22, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Byron S. Matthews, Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.

Charles E. Norman, City Atty., William M. Northcutt, Roy Hinkle, Asst. City Attys., Tom F. Birmingham, Legal Intern, Tulsa, for cross-petitioner in error.

Houston, Klein & Davidson, R.L. Davidson, Jr., J. Barry Epperson, Tulsa, for intervenors-defendants in error.

Maurice H. Merrill, Fielding D. Haas, Norman, amici curiae.

HODGES, Justice.

Involved in this appeal is a question of the proper procedure for the review of zoning decisions by a municipal authority.

Plaintiffs are the owners of property in the City of Tulsa, which under a zoning ordinance is limited to single family dwellings. Plaintiffs sought to have the property rezoned for apartment uses. On application to the Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission the change in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases