1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 305 F.Supp.
  5. 305 F.Supp. 931 (1969)
 

J. E. BERNARD & CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3834, Protest Nos. 65/15728-14628.

305 F.Supp. 931 (1969)

J. E. BERNARD & CO., Inc. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

May 29, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schwartz & Lidstrom, Chicago, Ill. (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City, Earl R. Lidstrom and Joseph Schwartz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel) for the plaintiff.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Mollie Strum and Alfred A. Taylor, Jr., New York City, trial attys.), for the defendant.

Before RAO, FORD and ROSENSTEIN, Judges.

ROSENSTEIN, Judge:

This case involves the proper tariff classification of certain cutting forms classified as manufactures of metal, not specially provided for, under paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, and assessed with duty thereunder at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims by amendment to the protest, that the merchandise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases