MAHNKE v. COUGHENOUR

No. 23835.

458 P.2d 747 (1969)

Roger D. MAHNKE, the Building Inspector of the City of Aspen, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. John F. COUGHENOUR, Jr. and James W. Stalder, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, In Department.

September 22, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stitt, Wittenbrink & Roan, Philip Roan, Westminster, for plaintiffs in error.

Hindry, Erickson & Meyer, Charles F. Brega, John J. Hanlon, Denver, for defendants in error.


DAY, Justice.

This writ of error challenges the correctness of the trial court's ruling that defendants must grant a building permit to plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs in error are the building inspector of the city of Aspen, Colorado, the Board of Adjustment of Aspen and its members, and the Planning and Zoning Commission of Aspen and its members. They will be referred to as defendants as they were in the trial court. Defendants in error will be referred to as plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases