1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 45 Wis.2d
  5. 45 Wis.2d 71 (1969)
 

HEUP v. HEUP

No. 105.

45 Wis.2d 71 (1969)

172 N.W.2d 334

HEUP, Respondent, v. HEUP, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 2, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Roland J. Steinle, Jr., of Milwaukee. There was also oral argument by Harvey W. Heup of Grafton, pro se.

For the respondent there was a brief by Niebler & Herro, attorneys, and Marshall J. Herro of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Marshall J. Herro.

HALLOWS, C. J.

In its opinion, the trial court took particular care to set forth why he believed the testimony of the plaintiff and did not believe the testimony of the defendant where their testimony was in conflict. From a review of the record, this court cannot say as a matter of law the trial court was in error in its determination of credibility; therefore, we accept the facts as found by the trial court.

In respect to the annulment claim, the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases