1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 275 Cal.App.2d
  5. 275 Cal.App.2d 889 (1969)
 

WINELAND v. SKAGIT CORP.

Docket No. 12036.

275 Cal.App.2d 889 (1969)

80 Cal. Rptr. 326

CHAUNCEY E. WINELAND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SKAGIT CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

August 26, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

P.M. Barceloux, Burton J. Goldstein, Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein and Albert E. Levy for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Price, Burness & Price and R.E. Burness for Defendant and Respondent.

BRAY, J.*

Appeal from judgment in favor of defendant Skagit Corporation after order sustaining demurrer to third amended complaint without leave to amend, presenting the question, should the third amended complaint have been sustained?

RECORD

[1] After demurrers of defendant Skagit to three complaints sustained with leave to amend, plaintiff filed his third

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases