SCHAEFER v. STRELECKI


107 N.J. Super. 7 (1969)

256 A.2d 609

HENRY SCHAEFER AND DOROTHY SCHAEFER, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTS, v. JUNE STRELECKI, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, DEPT. OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. HENRY SCHAEFER AND DOROTHY SCHAEFER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CECELIA BALDEROSE AND DANIEL BALDEROSE, HER HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 20, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Marvin Lieberman argued the cause for appellants Henry Schaefer and Dorothy Schaefer (Messrs. Jacob, Alfred & Richard Levinson, attorneys).

Mr. Newton H. Porter, Jr. argued the cause for respondent June Strelecki, Director, etc. (Messrs. Porter & Hobart, attorneys).

Mr. Michael J. Cernigliari argued the cause for respondents Cecelia Balderose and Daniel Balderose (Messrs. Campbell, Mangini, Foley & Lee, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.A.D.

These consolidated appeals involve two inconsistent and irreconcilable verdicts.

Plaintiffs first sued defendants Mr. and Mrs. Balderose (Balderose). The latter denied that their car was involved and affirmed their denial in depositions. They were supported by the deposition of an apparently independent witness, Lynch. They thereupon moved for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases