1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 417 F.2d
  5. 417 F.2d 721 (1969)
 

REDDING & COMPANY v. RUSSWINE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

No. 22593.

417 F.2d 721 (1969)

REDDING & COMPANY, Inc., Appellee, v. RUSSWINE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al., Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 21, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Mark P. Friedlander, Jr., Washington, D. C., argued the motion for appellee.

Mr. Louis P. Robbins, Washington, D. C., argued in opposition to the motion for appellant. Mr. Arnold L. Yochelson, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant.

Before BURGER, WRIGHT and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges.

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:

This case is now before us on the motion of the appellee, Redding & Co., Inc. (Redding), to require a supersedeas bond as a condition to a stay of an execution on what purports to be a judgment against the appellant, Russwine Construction Corporation (Russwine). Since this marks the eighth appearance of the litigation in this court1 — litigation that remains uncompleted in the District...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases