RAY v. DAVIS


458 P.2d 679 (1969)

In the matter of Substituting Statutory Way of Necessity, Janice Fehlberg RAY and Richard Ray, Respondents, v. Elmer DAVIS, Appellant, and Hazel Johnson, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 10, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gene B. Conklin, Pendleton, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was R.P. Smith, Pendleton.

Wm. A. Galbreath, Milton-Freewater, and George H. Corey, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondents Ray. On the brief were Corey, Byler & Rew, Pendleton, and Wm. A. Galbreath, Milton-Freewater.

J.T. Monahan, Milton-Freewater, argued the cause for respondent Johnson. On the brief were Monahan & Grove, Milton-Freewater.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, JJ.


Argued and Submitted at Pendleton May 6, 1969.

O'CONNELL, Justice.

This proceeding was initiated by plaintiffs to obtain a statutory way of necessity under ORS 376.105 et seq. The case was tried to the court without a jury. Defendant Davis appeals from a judgment granting a way of necessity over his land.1

In the trials before the County Court and the Circuit Court various methods of establishing ingress and egress from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases