1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 305 F.Supp.
  5. 305 F.Supp. 803 (1969)
 

HYLTE BRUKS AKTIEBOLAG v. BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY

No. 68 Civ. 3462.

305 F.Supp. 803 (1969)

HYLTE BRUKS AKTIEBOLAG and Nymolla, AB, Plaintiffs, v. The BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 14, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

White & Case, New York City, for plaintiffs; John M. Johnston, Jeffrey A. Barist, New York City, of counsel.

Walsh & Frisch, New York City, for defendant; E. Roger Frisch, Eric M. Dreyfus, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

COOPER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Hylte Bruks Aktiebolag (Hylte Bruks) and Nymolla move pursuant to Rule 12(b) (1), F.R.Civ.P., to dismiss plaintiff Hylte Bruks' claims against defendant Babcock & Wilcox Co. (B & W) for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. Alternatively, plaintiffs seek pursuant to Rule 41(a) (2), F.R.Civ. P., an order permitting them to voluntarily dismiss without condition Hylte Bruks' claims.

Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases