1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 408 F.2d
  5. 408 F.2d 671 (1969)
 

HAM v. UNITED STATES

No. 18591.

408 F.2d 671 (1969)

Walter HAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 21, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Brown, Cincinnati, Ohio, Brant & Hild, by Joseph A. Brant, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief for appellant.

Stanley Ruby, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, William A. Friedlander, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief; Robert M. Draper, U. S. Atty., Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for appellee.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The only question in this appeal is whether taxpayer, a pipefitter, who lived in Amelia, Clermont County, Ohio, is entitled to a deduction under Section 162 (a) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, for expenses incurred for lodging, meals and travel, in 1961, when he was employed in construction work in Lexington, Kentucky.

His employer's place of business was Cincinnati, Ohio, where taxpayer was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases